Determining Copyright Ownership in AI-Generated Music: The Role of User Prompts

The question of who holds the copyright in AI-generated music, particularly when a user provides prompts, is a complex and evolving legal issue. Traditionally, copyright law requires human authorship for protection. The U.S. Copyright Office has indicated that works generated solely by AI without significant human involvement do not qualify for copyright protection. But where a user contributes creative input—such as selecting specific prompts, refining outputs, or integrating AI-generated elements into a broader composition—the resulting work may be eligible for copyright protection and the prompter may be potentially recognized as the author. In the case references below, the level of input by the prompter was minimal and therefore not protectable by copyright. It is important to understand that this area of law is still developing. Those using AI tools for music creation should stay informed about current legal standards and consult legal experts when necessary.

CLICK HERE FOR ARTICLE

Copyrights for Golf Courses

Golf course designs have not been explicitly protected under U.S. copyright law in the past, leaving architects with limited legal recourse against unauthorized reproductions. However, the proposed Bolstering Intellectual Rights against Digital Infringement Enhancement (BIRDIE) Act seeks to amend the U.S. Copyright Act to include golf course designs within the definition of "architectural works." If enacted, this legislation would grant designers exclusive rights over their course layouts, including elements such as landscaping, paths, greens, tees, bunkers, and lakes. This move aims to align the rights of golf course architects with those of traditional building architects, providing them with tools to protect their creative works from unauthorized use or replication. CLICK HERE FOR ARTICLE

Can Wood Grain be Copyrighted?

It may if it is man-made! In copyright law, natural wood grain patterns are ineligible for protection, as these grains are the result of tree growth; however, if an individual creates an original, human-made pattern that mimics or is inspired by wood grain, that design has human authorship and may be eligible for copyright protection. Toppan Interamerica designs, prints and sells decorative papers and films featuring synthetic wood grains that are used on surfaces such as floors, counter tops, cabinets, and furniture. Toppan recently filed suit against Whalen LLC and filed a complaint with the International Trade Commission claiming that Whalen was importing furniture that infringed on Toppan's designs. While protections for man made grain patterns may not be particularly robust, they may still exist.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFORMATION